A fresh controversy is brewing ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup as an envoy linked to Donald Trump has reportedly suggested replacing Iran with Italy—despite Italy failing to qualify.

According to reports from Financial Times, echoed by Reuters and AFP, U.S. envoy Paolo Zampolli proposed the idea to FIFA, arguing that Italy’s historic pedigree—having won four World Cups—makes them worthy of inclusion.

However, the move has been widely dismissed as both controversial and unrealistic. Reports indicate the suggestion is tied more to diplomacy than football, with sources claiming it was aimed at easing tensions between Washington and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.

The backlash has been swift. Football authorities and analysts insist that qualification must be earned on the pitch—not negotiated behind closed doors. FIFA has also reportedly reaffirmed Iran’s place in the tournament, despite geopolitical tensions surrounding the country.

Iran, which has already secured its spot, is expected to participate, while Italy faces the bitter reality of missing out after failing in the qualification playoffs.

The proposal has since ignited heated debate across the football world, raising serious questions about political interference in global sports. As the countdown to kickoff continues, one thing is clear—this World Cup may be just as dramatic off the pitch as it is on it.